Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.59B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$65.33
Change+$0.24 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets926.54M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MWOFX (927M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.62) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. MWOFX (-2.63). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. MWOFX (20.50).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.995 | 5.666 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 927M | 17,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.01 | 10,779% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | -2.63 | -498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.37 | 37.73 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.67 | 20.50 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.18 | 95.36 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement