Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$61.29
Change-$4.37 (-6.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets921.86M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MWOFX (922M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (1.17) vs MWOFX (0.11). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX (23.00) and MWOFX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. MWOFX (-2.40). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.03 vs. MWOFX (5.00).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.22 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.32 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -2.046 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 922M | 17,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.11 | 1,035% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | -2.40 | -542% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 13.11 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 5.00 | 360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | 109.92 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement