Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.61
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.91
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets952.31M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MWOFX (952M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.65) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. MWOFX (2.37). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.85 vs. MWOFX (34.64).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.031 | 5.373 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 952M | 16,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.01 | 11,126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 2.37 | 477% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 27.25 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.85 | 34.64 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.22 | 89.49 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement