Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$71.08
Change-$0.67 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.17B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.01
Change-$0.58 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets922.57M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MWOFX (923M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.64) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.68 vs. MWOFX (-3.02). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. MWOFX (24.75).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.100 | 3.912 | 437% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 923M | 17,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.01 | 10,973% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | -3.02 | -386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.69 | 35.84 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.87 | 24.75 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.61 | 108.19 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement