Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$65.80
Change+$0.20 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.92M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MWOFX (962M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.65) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. MWOFX (5.74). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.62 vs. MWOFX (31.71).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.745 | 6.818 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 962M | 16,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.01 | 11,126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 5.74 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.52 | 26.47 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.62 | 31.71 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.02 | 90.42 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement