Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGLBX
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.15
Change+$0.78 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Marsico Global
Price$32.46
Change+$0.28 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.84M
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MGLBX (455M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPFX (0.62) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPFX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.05 vs. CNPFX (13.49). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. MGLBX (34.25).
| CNPFX | MGLBX | CNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.511 | 25.801 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 455M | 35,824% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 26.05 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 124.72 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.61 | 34.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.14 | 146.40 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement