Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSNGX
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.14M
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSNGX (134M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPFX (0.61) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.55 vs. CNPFX (11.68). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.62 vs. CNPFX (22.46).
| CNPFX | LSNGX | CNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.333 | 18.914 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 134M | 121,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | 14.55 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.35 | 98.41 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.46 | 36.62 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers