Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSNGX
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.47
Change-$1.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.38
Change-$0.56 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSNGX (130M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPFX (0.61) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. CNPFX (14.74). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. LSNGX (33.94).
| CNPFX | LSNGX | CNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.367 | 18.818 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 17.48 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 80.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 33.94 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement