Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSNGX
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.62
Change-$0.39 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$23.30
Change-$0.29 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.34M
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSNGX (125M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPFX (1.17) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. LSNGX (5.60). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.60 vs. CNPFX (18.03).
| CNPFX | LSNGX | CNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.90 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.06 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -4.145 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 125M | 130,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 5.60 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 61.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 21.60 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement