Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSGGX
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$23.51
Change-$2.33 (-9.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.4M
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSGGX (128M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPFX (1.17) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. LSGGX (5.52). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. CNPFX (18.03).
| CNPFX | LSGGX | CNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.95 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.13 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -4.158 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 128M | 127,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 5.52 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 61.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 21.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers