Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSGGX
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.13
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$24.82
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.52M
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSGGX (134M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPFX (0.61) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. CNPFX (12.10). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.80 vs. CNPFX (26.31).
| CNPFX | LSGGX | CNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.297 | 18.586 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 134M | 121,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | 15.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.79 | 72.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.31 | 28.80 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement