Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.33
Change-$2.19 (-9.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.4M
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (131M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (1.17) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. LSCGX (4.46). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.03 vs. LSCGX (14.55).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.13 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -4.221 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 131M | 124,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 4.46 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 56.61 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 14.55 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers