Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.67
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.71B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.61
Change-$0.17 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.25M
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSCGX (133M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (0.61) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. CNPFX (14.74). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. LSCGX (25.96).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.13 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.367 | 17.760 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 133M | 124,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 16.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 74.19 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 25.96 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement