Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$66.01
Change-$0.79 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.18 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.66M
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. LSCGX (131M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (0.68) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.18 vs. CNPFX (8.98). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.14 vs. LSCGX (41.15).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.13 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.748 | 8.437 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 131M | 115,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 22.18 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.46 | 73.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.14 | 41.15 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement