Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.63M
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (134M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (0.61) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.35 vs. CNPFX (11.68). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.64 vs. CNPFX (22.46).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.13 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.333 | 17.656 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 134M | 121,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | 13.35 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.35 | 92.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.46 | 28.64 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers