Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSAGX
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$23.03
Change-$2.30 (-9.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.4M
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSAGX (131M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPFX (1.17) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. LSAGX (5.26). LSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 19.76 vs. CNPFX (18.03).
| CNPFX | LSAGX | CNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.20 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.38 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -4.161 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 131M | 124,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 5.26 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 60.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 19.76 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers