Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs FWAFX
CNPFX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs FWAFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$37.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
CNPFX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. FWAFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a StrongBuy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWAFX (3.37B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: CNPFX (0.65) vs FWAFX (0.51). CNPFX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs FWAFX (17 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs CNPFX (250). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. FWAFX (1.83). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.18 vs. FWAFX (19.03).
| CNPFX | FWAFX | CNPFX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.98 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.98 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.502 | 10.475 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 3.37B | 4,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 1.83 | 751% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.92 | 31.29 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.18 | 19.03 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 60.89 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement