Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs FCGIX
CNPFX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.02
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$22.31
Change+$0.12 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.81M
CNPFX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. FCGIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FCGIX (41.8M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPFX (0.61) vs FCGIX (0.38). CNPFX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPFX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. FCGIX (5.30). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. CNPFX (26.42).
| CNPFX | FCGIX | CNPFX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.49 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.341 | 14.832 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 41.8M | 389,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.38 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 5.30 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 29.58 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.42 | 40.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement