Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSCGX
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529E
Price$69.32
Change-$2.47 (-3.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.33
Change-$2.19 (-9.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.4M
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (131M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPEX (0.76) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. LSCGX (4.46). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 15.40 vs. LSCGX (14.55).
| CNPEX | LSCGX | CNPEX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.95 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 2.13 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.583 | -4.221 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 131M | 124,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.48 | 4.46 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.84 | 56.61 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.40 | 14.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement