Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPCX vs HLGZX
CNPCX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPCX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective 529C
Price$66.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.28M
CNPCX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPCX vs. HLGZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPCX is a StrongBuy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLGZX (573M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than CNPCX: HLGZX (0.46) vs CNPCX (0.00). CNPCX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: CNPCX (24 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). CNPCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CNPCX (24.00). CNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: CNPCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). CNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. HLGZX (-13.92). CNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. HLGZX (-13.43).
| CNPCX | HLGZX | CNPCX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.76 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.77 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.840 | 8.700 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 573M | 27,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | -13.92 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.41 | 3.38 | 928% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | -13.43 | -241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement