Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPCX vs HLGZX
CNPCX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPCX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective 529C
Price$65.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.67M
CNPCX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPCX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPCX is a Buy and HLGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HLGZX (580M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than CNPCX: HLGZX (0.46) vs CNPCX (0.00). CNPCX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: CNPCX (23 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). CNPCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CNPCX (24.00). CNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: CNPCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). CNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.77 vs. HLGZX (-10.99). CNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.63 vs. HLGZX (-9.52).
| CNPCX | HLGZX | CNPCX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.76 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.77 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.147 | 9.997 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 580M | 27,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.77 | -10.99 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.68 | 15.25 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.63 | -9.52 | -385% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement