Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.30
Change+$0.37 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$20.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets459.77M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFIX (460M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.46) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. CNPAX (11.48). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.86 vs. CNPAX (25.45).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.155 | 16.250 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 460M | 35,435% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.20 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 14.25 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 43.02 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | 52.86 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers