Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.76M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ZGFIX (448M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.49) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. CNPAX (16.95). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 56.27 vs. CNPAX (43.51).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.649 | 13.239 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 448M | 35,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.20 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 17.85 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 45.67 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 56.27 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement