Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.76
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$20.02
Change+$0.17 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.69M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. ZGFIX (452M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.48) vs ZGFIX (0.21). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. CNPAX (10.76). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 57.70 vs. CNPAX (41.52).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.582 | 13.750 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 452M | 35,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.21 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 13.62 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 60.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | 57.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement