Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.74
Change-$0.23 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.76M
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ZGFAX (448M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.49) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX (17.80) and CNPAX (16.95) have marching annual gain over last year. ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.73 vs. CNPAX (43.51).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.649 | 13.234 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 448M | 35,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.20 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 17.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 44.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 54.73 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement