Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.30
Change+$0.37 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.24
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.22M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WAGSX (12.2M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. WAGSX (-5.26). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.45 vs. WAGSX (-13.84).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.155 | 1.574 | 1,217% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 12.2M | 1,336,066% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | -5.26 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 21.51 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | -13.84 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement