Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.16
Change-$0.12 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. WAGSX (12.2M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.45) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WAGSX (-3.53). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. WAGSX (-10.56).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 1.740 | 1,219% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 12.2M | 1,352,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -3.53 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | 23.17 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | -10.56 | -329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement