Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WAGSX (12.4M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. WAGSX (-1.28). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.90 vs. WAGSX (-6.85).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.073 | 2.568 | 743% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 12.4M | 1,314,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | -1.28 | -995% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.46 | 38.02 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | -6.85 | -524% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement