Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.41
Change-$2.56 (-3.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.16
Change-$0.40 (-3.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.35M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WAGSX (12.4M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.99) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. WAGSX (-6.17). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. WAGSX (-15.79).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.57 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.602 | -0.977 | -164% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 12.4M | 1,314,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | -6.17 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 13.96 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | -15.79 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement