Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PGRCX
CNPAX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
CNPAX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PGRCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and PGRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: CNPAX (0.48) vs PGRCX (0.02). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: CNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. PGRCX (-5.95). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.09 vs. PGRCX (9.74).
| CNPAX | PGRCX | CNPAX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.89 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.89 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.386 | 8.398 | 183% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 1.03B | 15,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.02 | 2,978% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | -5.95 | -228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 3.89 | 908% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.09 | 9.74 | 401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.36 | 15.31 | 623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement