Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PGRCX
CNPAX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.76
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
CNPAX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PGRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: CNPAX (0.48) vs PGRCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: CNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. PGRCX (-6.18). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. PGRCX (12.89).
| CNPAX | PGRCX | CNPAX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.89 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.89 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.582 | 10.035 | 175% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.03B | 15,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | -6.18 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 25.24 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | 12.89 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.44 | 27.49 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement