Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs OWLSX
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$23.16
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.16B
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. OWLSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and OWLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. OWLSX (26.2B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPAX (1.02) vs OWLSX (0.35). CNPAX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPAX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPAX (18.02) and OWLSX (17.74) have marching annual gain over last year. OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. CNPAX (20.53).
| CNPAX | OWLSX | CNPAX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.222 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 26.2B | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.35 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.02 | 17.74 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.74 | 53.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 35.16 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.39 | 110.92 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement