Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs OWLSX
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.32
Change-$0.80 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$20.74
Change-$0.25 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.29B
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. OWLSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and OWLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. OWLSX (24.3B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPAX (0.51) vs OWLSX (0.40). CNPAX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPAX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. OWLSX (5.39). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.72 vs. CNPAX (48.94).
| CNPAX | OWLSX | CNPAX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.668 | 4.589 | 189% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 24.3B | 621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.40 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 5.39 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 48.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 51.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 63.96 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers