Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.65
Change+$0.34 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$35.16
Change-$0.16 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets793.88M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. NBSSX (794M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.48) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. CNPAX (15.09). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. NBSSX (26.03).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.763 | 15.696 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 794M | 20,025% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.10 | 478% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.09 | 22.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 71.97 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 26.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.66 | 40.72 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement