Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.69
Change-$0.56 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.44M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. NBSSX (833M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.45) vs NBSSX (0.09). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.22 vs. CNPAX (14.57). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. NBSSX (25.65).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 22.573 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 833M | 19,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.09 | 483% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 20.22 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | 79.75 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 25.65 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | 48.56 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement