Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$35.25
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets837.04M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NBSSX (837M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.49) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.21 vs. CNPAX (16.95). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. NBSSX (32.97).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.649 | 15.992 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 837M | 18,877% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.10 | 480% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 26.21 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 71.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 32.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | 34.13 | 277% |