Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.34
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets817.5M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and NBSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NBSSX (818M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. CNPAX (12.70). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.90 vs. NBSSX (24.80).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.073 | 19.579 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 818M | 19,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.10 | 476% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 18.62 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.46 | 85.77 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | 24.80 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.83 | 42.59 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement