Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMCX
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$21.84
Change+$0.14 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.53M
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MLMCX (45.5M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: CNPAX (0.49) vs MLMCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. CNPAX (16.95). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 68.00 vs. CNPAX (43.51).
| CNPAX | MLMCX | CNPAX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.10 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.80 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.649 | 10.694 | 137% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 45.5M | 347,253% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 18.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 60.00 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 68.00 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |