Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMCX
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.93
Change+$0.38 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$21.31
Change+$0.17 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.79M
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MLMCX (44.8M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: CNPAX (0.49) vs MLMCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.98 vs. CNPAX (11.17). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.99 vs. CNPAX (46.68).
| CNPAX | MLMCX | CNPAX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.10 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.80 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.944 | 8.008 | 162% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 44.8M | 348,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 11.98 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 59.75 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | 71.99 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement