Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMCX
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.02
Change-$0.39 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$22.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.49M
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MLMCX (56.5M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: CNPAX (0.99) vs MLMCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLMCX (10 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. MLMCX (11.89). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.35 vs. CNPAX (17.17).
| CNPAX | MLMCX | CNPAX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.10 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.80 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.602 | 0.534 | 300% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 56.5M | 288,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 11.89 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 47.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | 37.35 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.09 | N/A | - |