Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMAX
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core A
Price$24.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.4M
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MLMAX (55.4M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: CNPAX (0.46) vs MLMAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLMAX (10 years). MLMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). MLMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. CNPAX (11.89). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.60 vs. CNPAX (21.85).
| CNPAX | MLMAX | CNPAX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.35 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.00 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.452 | 16.691 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 55.4M | 294,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 14.10 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.67 | 70.03 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.85 | 55.60 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.15 | N/A | - |