Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Marsico Global
Price$31.69
Change-$0.68 (-2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.45M
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGLBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. MGLBX (463M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPAX (0.45) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPAX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.26 vs. CNPAX (14.57). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.16 vs. CNPAX (34.72).
| CNPAX | MGLBX | CNPAX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 26.544 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 463M | 35,637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 24.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | 112.68 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 38.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | 149.38 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement