Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFZX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.76
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
MassMutual Global I
Price$10.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.56M
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFZX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. MGFZX (152M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPAX (0.48) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFZX (6.00). MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. MGFZX (-6.10). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. MGFZX (-26.98).
| CNPAX | MGFZX | CNPAX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.582 | 10.123 | 174% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 152M | 105,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | -6.10 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | -0.28 | -22,521% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | -26.98 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.44 | -17.18 | -701% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement