Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFSX
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.97
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.71B
MassMutual Global R5
Price$11.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.55M
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. MGFSX (155M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPAX (0.45) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFSX (21 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFSX (6.00). MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. MGFSX (-0.27). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. MGFSX (-31.65).
| CNPAX | MGFSX | CNPAX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 15.416 | 138% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 155M | 106,452% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -0.27 | -5,469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | -7.80 | -664% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | -31.65 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | -20.63 | -532% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers