Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.59B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$25.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.7M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSNGX (137M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.46) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.44 vs. CNPAX (12.92). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. CNPAX (35.64).
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.843 | 21.201 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 137M | 118,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 25.44 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.58 | 99.84 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.64 | 40.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement