Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.32
Change-$0.80 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$22.86
Change-$0.20 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.66M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. LSNGX (131M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.51) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSNGX (8 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.43 vs. CNPAX (8.81). LSNGX (50.10) and CNPAX (48.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.668 | 8.909 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 131M | 115,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 23.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 79.29 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 50.10 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement