Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.38
Change-$0.56 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSNGX (130M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.45) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. CNPAX (14.57). CNPAX (34.72) and LSNGX (33.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 18.818 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 17.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | 80.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 33.94 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement