Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.76
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$25.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.66M
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. LSGGX (141M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.48) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.40 vs. CNPAX (10.17). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.36 vs. CNPAX (40.77).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.95 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.959 | 21.070 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 141M | 114,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 24.40 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.70 | 99.21 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.77 | 48.36 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement