Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$24.30
Change-$0.56 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSGGX (130M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.45) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. CNPAX (12.99). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.52 vs. LSGGX (30.65).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.95 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.220 | 16.101 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 15.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.57 | 78.02 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.52 | 30.65 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement