Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.32
Change-$0.80 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$22.80
Change-$0.19 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.66M
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. LSGGX (131M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.51) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.38 vs. CNPAX (8.81). LSGGX (49.80) and CNPAX (48.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.95 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.668 | 8.935 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 131M | 115,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 23.38 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 79.10 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 49.80 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement