Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.41
Change-$2.56 (-3.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$23.51
Change-$2.33 (-9.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.4M
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSGGX (128M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.99) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. LSGGX (5.52). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. CNPAX (17.17).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.602 | -4.158 | -39% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 128M | 127,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 5.52 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 61.36 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | 21.31 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.09 | N/A | - |