Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.41
Change-$2.56 (-3.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.33
Change-$2.19 (-9.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.4M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (131M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.99) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. LSCGX (4.46). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. LSCGX (14.55).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.13 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.602 | -4.221 | -38% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 131M | 124,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 4.46 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 56.61 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | 14.55 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement