Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.76
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.10
Change-$0.51 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSCGX (130M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.45) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. CNPAX (14.57). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. LSCGX (25.96).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.203 | 17.760 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 16.25 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.76 | 74.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 25.96 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement