Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.32
Change-$0.80 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.18 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.66M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. LSCGX (131M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.51) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.18 vs. CNPAX (8.81). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.94 vs. LSCGX (41.15).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.668 | 8.437 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 131M | 115,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 22.18 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 73.21 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 41.15 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement