Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.98
Change+$0.33 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.58
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.04M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (138M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.48) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. CNPAX (17.66). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.05 vs. LSCGX (34.17).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.303 | 17.396 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 138M | 115,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.66 | 28.65 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.63 | 75.00 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.05 | 34.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers