Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$23.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.38M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (136M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.46) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.23 vs. CNPAX (12.70). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.90 vs. LSCGX (31.75).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.073 | 20.156 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 136M | 119,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 24.23 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.46 | 91.77 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | 31.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers