Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.30
Change+$0.37 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$22.31
Change+$0.12 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.81M
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FCGIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FCGIX (41.8M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPAX (0.46) vs FCGIX (0.38). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPAX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. FCGIX (5.30). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. CNPAX (25.45).
| CNPAX | FCGIX | CNPAX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.155 | 14.832 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 41.8M | 389,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 5.30 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 29.58 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | 40.35 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement