CNOBP
Price
$22.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TFC
Price
$42.61
Change
+$0.07 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
52.02B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs TFC

Header iconCNOBP vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs TFCBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$22.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$369
CapitalizationN/A
Truist Financial
Price$42.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.16%)
Volume$8.26M
Capitalization52.02B
CNOBP vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. TFC commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a Buy and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $22.87 vs. TFC: $42.61)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 4% vs. TFC: 112%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. TFC: $52.02B
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the long-term than CNOBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOBP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOBP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than CNOBP.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 2.495 vs. TFC (0.660). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.07B vs. CNOBP (61.4M). CNOBP has less debt than TFC: CNOBP (1.03B) vs TFC (59.7B). TFC has higher revenues than CNOBP: TFC (23.4B) vs CNOBP (269M).
CNOBPTFCCNOBP / TFC
CapitalizationN/A52B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.4950.660378%
P/E RatioN/A7.93-
Revenue269M23.4B1%
Total Cash61.4M5.07B1%
Total Debt1.03B59.7B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBPTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSI39.300.78
+2.02%
Dimensional International Sstby Cr 1 ETF
IQQQ40.620.18
+0.45%
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
HTEC28.400.06
+0.22%
Robo Global® Hlthcare Tech & Innovt ETF
USSH50.65N/A
N/A
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Trsy ETF
FBND45.59-0.10
-0.23%
Fidelity Total Bond ETF

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with CMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then CMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
N/A
CMA - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
TFC - CNOBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
BLX - CNOBP
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
FBK - CNOBP
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
HBAN - CNOBP
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+0.16%
CFG - TFC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
HBAN - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
PNC - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
FITB - TFC
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
FNB - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
More