CNOBP
Price
$23.81
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
LSBK
Price
$13.06
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
102.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs LSBK

Header iconCNOBP vs LSBK Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs LSBKBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$23.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$2.29K
CapitalizationN/A
Lake Shore Ban
Price$13.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$27.77K
Capitalization102.2M
CNOBP vs LSBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. LSBK commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a Buy and LSBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $23.81 vs. LSBK: $13.06)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and LSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 31% vs. LSBK: 47%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. LSBK: $102.2M
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. LSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $102.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLSBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNOBP is a better buy in the long-term than LSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSBK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LSBK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSBK is a better buy in the short-term than CNOBP.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while LSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 8.208 vs. LSBK (-3.143). CNOBP has more cash in the bank: 97.8M vs. LSBK (2.93M). LSBK has less debt than CNOBP: LSBK (2M) vs CNOBP (1.1B). CNOBP has higher revenues than LSBK: CNOBP (288M) vs LSBK (25.7M).
CNOBPLSBKCNOBP / LSBK
CapitalizationN/A102M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.208-3.143-261%
P/E RatioN/A12.44-
Revenue288M25.7M1,121%
Total Cash97.8M2.93M3,342%
Total Debt1.1B2M54,800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSBK: Fundamental Ratings
LSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBPLSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRRDF0.850.01
+1.38%
Meridian Mining UK Societas
SARTF201.68N/A
N/A
Sartorius AG
FRTN0.05N/A
N/A
Fortran Corp.
HBUV1.30N/A
N/A
Hubilu Venture Corporation
SEGSF2.55N/A
N/A
SIA Engineering Company Ltd.

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with VLYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then VLYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
-0.04%
VLYPP - CNOBP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
VLYPO - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
BFST - CNOBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
BUSE - CNOBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ONB - CNOBP
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
More

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSBK and CMA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSBK and CMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
+0.15%
CMA - LSBK
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
AFBI - LSBK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - LSBK
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
CNOBP - LSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
FRST - LSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More