CNOBP
Price
$23.29
Change
+$0.09 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FBK
Price
$48.54
Change
-$0.25 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs FBK

Header iconCNOBP vs FBK Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs FBKBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$23.29
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
Volume$6.02K
CapitalizationN/A
FB Financial
Price$48.54
Change-$0.25 (-0.51%)
Volume$319.7K
Capitalization1.76B
CNOBP vs FBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. FBK commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a Buy and FBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $23.29 vs. FBK: $48.54)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and FBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 104% vs. FBK: 93%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. FBK: $1.76B
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBK is a better buy in the long-term than CNOBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBK is a better buy in the short-term than CNOBP.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while FBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 4.377 vs. FBK (-5.034). FBK has more cash in the bank: 188M vs. CNOBP (61.4M). FBK has less debt than CNOBP: FBK (468M) vs CNOBP (1.03B). FBK has higher revenues than CNOBP: FBK (478M) vs CNOBP (269M).
CNOBPFBKCNOBP / FBK
CapitalizationN/A1.77B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.377-5.034-87%
P/E RatioN/A14.34-
Revenue269M478M56%
Total Cash61.4M188M33%
Total Debt1.03B468M219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBK: Fundamental Ratings
FBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBPFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBFCX34.740.08
+0.23%
Neuberger Berman Focus Trust
MIEYX15.090.02
+0.13%
MM S&P 500® Index Adm
AKRIX74.47-0.17
-0.23%
Akre Focus Instl
RVACX20.35-0.08
-0.39%
Victory RS Value C
ENTIX19.69-0.20
-1.01%
ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ Instl

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with VLYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then VLYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
+0.39%
VLYPP - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
TFC - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
BUSE - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
CMA - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
FBK - CNOBP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More

FBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBK has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBK jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBK
1D Price
Change %
FBK100%
-0.51%
ABCB - FBK
92%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
UBSI - FBK
91%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
FNB - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
SFBS - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
ASB - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More