CNOBP
Price
$24.07
Change
-$0.08 (-0.33%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ESQ
Price
$104.44
Change
+$2.47 (+2.42%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
873.51M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs ESQ

Header iconCNOBP vs ESQ Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs ESQBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$24.07
Change-$0.08 (-0.33%)
Volume$872
CapitalizationN/A
Esquire Financial Holdings
Price$104.44
Change+$2.47 (+2.42%)
Volume$788
Capitalization873.51M
CNOBP vs ESQ Comparison Chart in %
CNOBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. ESQ commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a StrongBuy and ESQ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $24.15 vs. ESQ: $101.97)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and ESQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 161% vs. ESQ: 18%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. ESQ: $873.51M
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. ESQ’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $873.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESQ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the long-term than CNOBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the short-term than CNOBP.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.00% price change this week, while ESQ (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESQ is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESQ YTD gains are higher at: 29.009 vs. CNOBP (9.752). CNOBP has more cash in the bank: 49.8M vs. ESQ (614K). ESQ has less debt than CNOBP: ESQ (49K) vs CNOBP (1.1B). CNOBP has higher revenues than ESQ: CNOBP (288M) vs ESQ (135M).
CNOBPESQCNOBP / ESQ
CapitalizationN/A874M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.75229.00934%
P/E RatioN/A17.95-
Revenue288M135M213%
Total Cash49.8M614K8,111%
Total Debt1.1B49K2,236,735%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESQ: Fundamental Ratings
ESQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBPESQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHOE16.620.62
+3.88%
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited
FGBIP15.420.28
+1.85%
First Guaranty Bancshares
BLX44.97-0.02
-0.03%
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA
FRT97.63-0.69
-0.70%
Federal Realty Investment Trust
KRRO5.33-0.05
-0.93%
Korro Bio

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with MSBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then MSBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
+0.50%
MSBI - CNOBP
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.04%
AFBI - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
ESQ - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
SBNY - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BFST - CNOBP
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

ESQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been loosely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESQ
1D Price
Change %
ESQ100%
-0.16%
IBCP - ESQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
TOWN - ESQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
SMBC - ESQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
TRMK - ESQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
BANF - ESQ
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More