CNOB
Price
$27.27
Change
+$0.96 (+3.65%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.32B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$57.18
Change
+$1.03 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.07B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOB vs WSFS

Header iconCNOB vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs WSFSBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$27.27
Change+$0.96 (+3.65%)
Volume$5.85K
Capitalization1.32B
WSFS Financial
Price$57.18
Change+$1.03 (+1.83%)
Volume$9.91K
Capitalization3.07B
CNOB vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
CNOB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOB vs. WSFS commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CNOB: $26.31 vs. WSFS: $56.15)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 79% vs. WSFS: 117%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $1.32B vs. WSFS: $3.07B
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.32B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than CNOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the short-term than CNOB.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($3.07B) has a higher market cap than CNOB($1.32B). CNOB has higher P/E ratio than WSFS: CNOB (19.95) vs WSFS (11.62). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 1.647 vs. CNOB (0.343). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. CNOB (49.8M). WSFS has less debt than CNOB: WSFS (255M) vs CNOB (1.07B). WSFS has higher revenues than CNOB: WSFS (1.06B) vs CNOB (344M).
CNOBWSFSCNOB / WSFS
Capitalization1.32B3.07B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.3431.64721%
P/E Ratio19.9511.62172%
Revenue344M1.06B33%
Total Cash49.8M1.32B4%
Total Debt1.07B255M419%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5457
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7258
SMR RATING
1..100
2314
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1658
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSFS's Valuation (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCPIX116.671.21
+1.05%
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Inv
MNDBX17.610.09
+0.51%
MFS New Discovery B
SUVQX12.690.05
+0.40%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R6
BPSCX25.120.04
+0.16%
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II Inv
FEMKX52.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Markets

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
+1.62%
FRME - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
WSFS - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
OSBC - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
STEL - CNOB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
STBA - CNOB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.72%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
STBA - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
TRMK - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
UBSI - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
FNB - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More