CNOB
Price
$26.85
Change
-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$65.21
Change
-$0.15 (-0.23%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.45B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOB vs HWC

Header iconCNOB vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs HWCBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$26.85
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$165.86K
Capitalization1.35B
Hancock Whitney
Price$65.21
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
Volume$274.01K
Capitalization5.45B
CNOB vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
CNOB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOB vs. HWC commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOB: $26.85 vs. HWC: $65.21)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 61% vs. HWC: 33%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $1.35B vs. HWC: $5.45B
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.35B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than CNOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.65% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.45B) has a higher market cap than CNOB($1.35B). CNOB has higher P/E ratio than HWC: CNOB (20.34) vs HWC (11.71). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 22.035 vs. CNOB (19.747). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. CNOB (49.8M). CNOB has less debt than HWC: CNOB (1.07B) vs HWC (1.63B). HWC has higher revenues than CNOB: HWC (1.49B) vs CNOB (344M).
CNOBHWCCNOB / HWC
Capitalization1.35B5.45B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.74722.03590%
P/E Ratio20.3411.71174%
Revenue344M1.49B23%
Total Cash49.8M513M10%
Total Debt1.07B1.63B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6425
SMR RATING
1..100
2412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1456
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNOB (74). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNOB (64). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (24). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (46). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (56). This means that CNOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVPSX12.680.02
+0.16%
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap
RLNCX49.660.06
+0.12%
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
RMFBX59.020.01
+0.02%
American Funds American Mutual R2
GSVRX14.61N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value R
HFMTX29.25-0.05
-0.17%
Hartford MidCap R5

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
-0.26%
FRME - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
RNST - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
WSFS - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
STEL - CNOB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
OSBC - CNOB
83%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.23%
FNB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
ONB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
WTFC - HWC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More