CNOB
Price
$25.26
Change
+$0.12 (+0.48%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
26 days until earnings call
FLG
Price
$11.58
Change
+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.81B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOB vs FLG

Header iconCNOB vs FLG Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs FLGBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$25.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
Volume$252.47K
Capitalization1.27B
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Volume$3.55M
Capitalization4.81B
CNOB vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOB vs. FLG commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a StrongBuy and FLG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOB: $25.26 vs. FLG: $11.58)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 78% vs. FLG: 61%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $1.27B vs. FLG: $4.81B
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.27B. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($4.81B) has a higher market cap than CNOB($1.27B). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 24.426 vs. CNOB (12.656). CNOB has less debt than FLG: CNOB (1.1B) vs FLG (13.2B). FLG has higher revenues than CNOB: FLG (2.15B) vs CNOB (288M).
CNOBFLGCNOB / FLG
Capitalization1.27B4.81B26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.65624.42652%
P/E Ratio30.80N/A-
Revenue288M2.15B13%
Total Cash97.8MN/A-
Total Debt1.1B13.2B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs FLG: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6281
SMR RATING
1..100
2911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (22) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNOB (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (81) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPEAX25.730.21
+0.82%
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha A
GOFIX20.950.16
+0.77%
GMO Resources III
RIDBX27.000.15
+0.56%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
CTHRX113.900.24
+0.21%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst2
FAOSX37.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Z

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
+0.48%
STBA - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
N/A
FRME - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
BBT - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
HWC - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
SRCE - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
More

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+0.26%
VLY - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
STBA - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
CNOB - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
BKU - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
FRME - FLG
66%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
More