CNO
Price
$43.60
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.16B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRU
Price
$114.55
Change
+$0.37 (+0.32%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
40.08B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs PRU

Header iconCNO vs PRU Comparison
Open Charts CNO vs PRUBanner chart's image
CNO Financial Group
Price$43.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$289.49K
Capitalization4.16B
Prudential Financial
Price$114.55
Change+$0.37 (+0.32%)
Volume$591.23K
Capitalization40.08B
CNO vs PRU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNO vs. PRU commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Buy and PRU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CNO: $43.60 vs. PRU: $114.55)
Brand notoriety: CNO: Not notable vs. PRU: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 43% vs. PRU: 35%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $4.16B vs. PRU: $40.08B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $4.16B. PRU’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $40.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $168.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $29.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRU is a better buy in the long-term than CNO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNO is a better buy in the short-term than PRU.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

PRU is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.03% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRU($40.1B) has a higher market cap than CNO($4.16B). PRU (15.69) and CNO (14.93) have similar P/E ratio . CNO YTD gains are higher at: 18.687 vs. PRU (0.335). PRU has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. CNO (8.6B). CNO has less debt than PRU: CNO (4.05B) vs PRU (22.1B). PRU has higher revenues than CNO: PRU (57.9B) vs CNO (4.44B).
CNOPRUCNO / PRU
Capitalization4.16B40.1B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.6870.3355,579%
P/E Ratio14.9315.6995%
Revenue4.44B57.9B8%
Total Cash8.6B71.4B12%
Total Debt4.05B22.1B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs PRU: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
PRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1631
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRU's Valuation (20) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (57) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

PRU's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOPRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDV66.090.56
+0.85%
Vanguard Extended Duration Trs ETF
GDL8.470.01
+0.09%
GDL Fund (The)
LIVR29.43N/A
N/A
INTELLIGENT LIVERMORE ETF LIVR
SHRT7.54-0.01
-0.15%
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
EWJV39.74-0.13
-0.32%
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
+0.07%
MET - CNO
80%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
PRU - CNO
79%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
JXN - CNO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
PRI - CNO
76%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
LNC - CNO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

PRU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRU has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRU jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRU
1D Price
Change %
PRU100%
+0.32%
MET - PRU
89%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
LNC - PRU
81%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
JXN - PRU
79%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
CNO - PRU
74%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
PRI - PRU
74%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More