CNNE
Price
$16.32
Change
+$0.06 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
841.14M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KRUS
Price
$73.72
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
892.74M
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNNE vs KRUS

Header iconCNNE vs KRUS Comparison
Open Charts CNNE vs KRUSBanner chart's image
Cannae Holdings
Price$16.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
Volume$200
Capitalization841.14M
Kura Sushi USA
Price$73.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization892.74M
CNNE vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
CNNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNNE vs. KRUS commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNNE is a Hold and KRUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CNNE: $16.27 vs. KRUS: $73.71)
Brand notoriety: CNNE and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNNE: 55% vs. KRUS: 75%
Market capitalization -- CNNE: $841.14M vs. KRUS: $892.74M
CNNE [@Restaurants] is valued at $841.14M. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $892.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNNE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNNE is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNNE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the short-term than CNNE.

Price Growth

CNNE (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.29% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was +32.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNNE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.51% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KRUS($893M) has a higher market cap than CNNE($841M). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: 40.856 vs. CNNE (3.433). KRUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.17M vs. CNNE (-177.6M). KRUS has less debt than CNNE: KRUS (166M) vs CNNE (210M). CNNE has higher revenues than KRUS: CNNE (430M) vs KRUS (269M).
CNNEKRUSCNNE / KRUS
Capitalization841M893M94%
EBITDA-177.6M4.17M-4,258%
Gain YTD3.43340.8568%
P/E RatioN/A292.35-
Revenue430M269M160%
Total CashN/A60M-
Total Debt210M166M127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNNE vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
CNNE
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNNE's Valuation (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that CNNE’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNNE (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNNE’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CNNE (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to CNNE’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNNE (78) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNNE’s over the last 12 months.

CNNE's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that CNNE’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNNEKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPOCX17.350.01
+0.06%
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
DNINX23.040.01
+0.04%
Dunham International Stock N
AMRCX4.98N/A
N/A
American Growth One C
AIIEX21.52-0.06
-0.28%
Invesco EQV International Equity A
FUNCX25.46-0.22
-0.86%
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth C

CNNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNNE has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNNE jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNNE
1D Price
Change %
CNNE100%
N/A
FRSH - CNNE
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
KRUS - CNNE
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
CAKE - CNNE
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
SHAK - CNNE
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
STKS - CNNE
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
+2.30%
CAKE - KRUS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
FWRG - KRUS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
SHAK - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
DIN - KRUS
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
BJRI - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More