It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDPLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPLMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNM (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +5.78% price change this week, while DPLMF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.
CNM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
CNM | DPLMF | CNM / DPLMF | |
Capitalization | 11B | 5.58B | 197% |
EBITDA | 894M | 200M | 447% |
Gain YTD | 18.562 | 7.555 | 246% |
P/E Ratio | 26.64 | 34.84 | 76% |
Revenue | 6.7B | 1.15B | 584% |
Total Cash | 1M | 72.1M | 1% |
Total Debt | 2.07B | 288M | 719% |
CNM | DPLMF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago33% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago17% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago20% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago20% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago20% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | N/A |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago64% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GDXD | 3.35 | 0.30 | +9.84% |
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN | |||
BOUT | 36.35 | 0.50 | +1.38% |
Innovator IBD® Breakout Opps ETF | |||
DIVI | 35.62 | 0.37 | +1.05% |
Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF | |||
DNOV | 44.51 | 0.09 | +0.21% |
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
DHDG | 31.84 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNM has been closely correlated with FERG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNM jumps, then FERG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that DPLMF and HPURF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPLMF and HPURF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DPLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DPLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
HPURF - DPLMF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FERG - DPLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
IVCHF - DPLMF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CNM - DPLMF | -3% Poorly correlated | +1.79% |