CNL
Price
$3.54
Change
+$0.08 (+2.31%)
Updated
Nov 15, 02:15 PM (EDT)
139 days until earnings call
ORAAF
Price
$11.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

CNL vs ORAAF

Header iconCNL vs ORAAF Comparison
Open Charts CNL vs ORAAFBanner chart's image
COLLECTIVE MINING
Price$3.54
Change+$0.08 (+2.31%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Aura Minerals
Price$11.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$610
CapitalizationN/A
CNL vs ORAAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNL vs. ORAAF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNL is a Hold and ORAAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CNL: $3.46 vs. ORAAF: $11.30)
Brand notoriety: CNL and ORAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNL: 74% vs. ORAAF: 30%
Market capitalization -- CNL: $272.24M vs. ORAAF: $559.05M
CNL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $272.24M. ORAAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $559.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORAAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORAAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORAAF is a better buy in the long-term than CNL.

Price Growth

CNL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.42% price change this week, while ORAAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNL is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORAAF($559M) has a higher market cap than CNL($272M). ORAAF YTD gains are higher at: 60.057 vs. CNL (7.788). ORAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 110M vs. CNL (-16.99M). ORAAF has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. CNL (26.7M). CNL has less debt than ORAAF: CNL (71.9K) vs ORAAF (240M). ORAAF has higher revenues than CNL: ORAAF (377M) vs CNL (0).
CNLORAAFCNL / ORAAF
Capitalization272M559M49%
EBITDA-16.99M110M-15%
Gain YTD7.78860.05713%
P/E RatioN/A14.20-
Revenue0377M-
Total Cash26.7M103M26%
Total Debt71.9K240M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORAAF: Fundamental Ratings
ORAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNL has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNL jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNL
1D Price
Change %
CNL100%
N/A
VITFF - CNL
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSVRF - CNL
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
CAHPF - CNL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - CNL
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.71%
BYAGF - CNL
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
More

ORAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORAAF and MMTMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORAAF and MMTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORAAF
1D Price
Change %
ORAAF100%
N/A
MMTMF - ORAAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUMXF - ORAAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
DNGDF - ORAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
CNL - ORAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCOF - ORAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
More