CNL
Price
$14.13
Change
+$0.55 (+4.05%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.2B
46 days until earnings call
EFRGF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.02 (+4.88%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
47.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNL vs EFRGF

Header iconCNL vs EFRGF Comparison
Open Charts CNL vs EFRGFBanner chart's image
COLLECTIVE MINING
Price$14.13
Change+$0.55 (+4.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.2B
Pasofino Gold
Price$0.43
Change+$0.02 (+4.88%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization47.53M
CNL vs EFRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNL vs. EFRGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNL is a StrongBuy and EFRGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CNL: $14.17 vs. EFRGF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: CNL and EFRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNL: 54% vs. EFRGF: 33%
Market capitalization -- CNL: $1.2B vs. EFRGF: $47.53M
CNL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.2B. EFRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $47.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEFRGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EFRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFRGF is a better buy in the long-term than CNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFRGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EFRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFRGF is a better buy in the short-term than CNL.

Price Growth

CNL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.90% price change this week, while EFRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNL($1.2B) has a higher market cap than EFRGF($47.5M). CNL YTD gains are higher at: 239.663 vs. EFRGF (6.093). EFRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.86M vs. CNL (-40.63M). CNL has more cash in the bank: 70.6M vs. EFRGF (1.18M). CNL (0) and EFRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CNLEFRGFCNL / EFRGF
Capitalization1.2B47.5M2,531%
EBITDA-40.63M-6.86M592%
Gain YTD239.6636.0933,933%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash70.6M1.18M6,003%
Total Debt1.18MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNLEFRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPMIX20.56N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port I
BMSBX15.01N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq B
JEMCX37.34N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity C
HDQVX18.28N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson International Div S
FCLZX13.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action Z

CNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNL has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNL jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNL
1D Price
Change %
CNL100%
+4.05%
AEM - CNL
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
WPM - CNL
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
AGI - CNL
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
FNV - CNL
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
EGO - CNL
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

EFRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRGF and MAGE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRGF and MAGE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRGF
1D Price
Change %
EFRGF100%
N/A
MAGE - EFRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - EFRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CALRF - EFRGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - EFRGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
GRLGF - EFRGF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More