CNL
Price
$9.58
Change
+$0.05 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
806.85M
3 days until earnings call
ECRTF
Price
$1.43
Change
-$0.12 (-7.74%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
435.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNL vs ECRTF

Header iconCNL vs ECRTF Comparison
Open Charts CNL vs ECRTFBanner chart's image
COLLECTIVE MINING
Price$9.58
Change+$0.05 (+0.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization806.85M
Atex Resources
Price$1.43
Change-$0.12 (-7.74%)
Volume$39.35K
Capitalization435.04M
CNL vs ECRTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNL vs. ECRTF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNL is a Buy and ECRTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CNL: $9.53 vs. ECRTF: $1.43)
Brand notoriety: CNL and ECRTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNL: 128% vs. ECRTF: 209%
Market capitalization -- CNL: $812.83M vs. ECRTF: $446.45M
CNL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $812.83M. ECRTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $446.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $75.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECRTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECRTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNL and ECRTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECRTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ECRTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECRTF is a better buy in the short-term than CNL.

Price Growth

CNL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.25% price change this week, while ECRTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNL is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNL($807M) has a higher market cap than ECRTF($435M). CNL YTD gains are higher at: 129.087 vs. ECRTF (14.400). CNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -38.59M vs. ECRTF (-54.21M). CNL has more cash in the bank: 78M vs. ECRTF (44.6M). ECRTF has less debt than CNL: ECRTF (324K) vs CNL (1.25M). CNL (0) and ECRTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CNLECRTFCNL / ECRTF
Capitalization807M435M186%
EBITDA-38.59M-54.21M71%
Gain YTD129.08714.400896%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash78M44.6M175%
Total Debt1.25M324K384%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRTF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNLECRTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NASDX43.780.41
+0.95%
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
FMFAX89.350.58
+0.65%
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
PJFZX76.070.19
+0.25%
PGIM Jennison Growth Z
SGAPX24.040.03
+0.12%
Virtus SGA Global Growth I
TMCGX15.45-0.10
-0.64%
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth S

CNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNL has been loosely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNL jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNL
1D Price
Change %
CNL100%
-2.56%
WPM - CNL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
AEM - CNL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
AGI - CNL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
RGLD - CNL
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
CGAU - CNL
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.76%
More

ECRTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRTF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRTF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRTF
1D Price
Change %
ECRTF100%
-7.74%
CNL - ECRTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
ONXGF - ECRTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
EDVMF - ECRTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
ELRRF - ECRTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
ELKMF - ECRTF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More