Advertisement
CNH vs MTW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNH is a Hold and MTW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CNH (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -1.98% price change this week, while MTW (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
MTW is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+0.46% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| CNH | MTW | CNH / MTW | |
| Capitalization | 11.7B | 450M | 2,600% |
| EBITDA | 2.87B | 110M | 2,605% |
| Gain YTD | -15.572 | 38.883 | -40% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.56 | 7.92 | 247% |
| Revenue | 17.8B | 2.16B | 824% |
| Total Cash | 2.3B | 39.7M | 5,801% |
| Total Debt | 27.4B | 554M | 4,946% |
CNH | MTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNH's Valuation (27) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTW (64). This means that CNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTW’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (95). This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's SMR Rating (75) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (77). This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNH (80). This means that MTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNH’s over the last 12 months.
CNH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTW (32). This means that CNH’s stock grew similarly to MTW’s over the last 12 months.
| CNH | MTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 61% | 15 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MFSV | 26.85 | 0.10 | +0.37% |
| MFS Active Value ETF | |||
| JANU | 28.49 | 0.10 | +0.37% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF | |||
| PEJ | 62.11 | 0.20 | +0.32% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
| PJAN | 46.94 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| JDVI | 36.04 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| JHancock Discp Val Intl Sel ETF | |||
CNH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNH has been closely correlated with AGCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNH jumps, then AGCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNH | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AGCO - CNH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| DE - CNH | 78% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| TEX - CNH | 66% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| PCAR - CNH | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| ALG - CNH | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||
MTW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTW has been closely correlated with TEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTW jumps, then TEX could also see price increases.