CNGO
Price
$23.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
828.12M
RTO
Price
$23.39
Change
-$0.49 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.03B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNGO vs RTO

Header iconCNGO vs RTO Comparison
Open Charts CNGO vs RTOBanner chart's image
Cengage Learning Holdings II
Price$23.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200K
Capitalization828.12M
Rentokil Initial
Price$23.39
Change-$0.49 (-2.05%)
Volume$896.71K
Capitalization15.03B
CNGO vs RTO Comparison Chart
Loading...
RTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNGO vs. RTO commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGO is a Hold and RTO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CNGO: $23.50 vs. RTO: $23.39)
Brand notoriety: CNGO and RTO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNGO: 105% vs. RTO: 121%
Market capitalization -- CNGO: $828.12M vs. RTO: $15.03B
CNGO [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $828.12M. RTO’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $15.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNGO is a better buy in the long-term than RTO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RTO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CNGO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

RTO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTO($15B) has a higher market cap than CNGO($828M). CNGO YTD gains are higher at: 20.513 vs. RTO (-6.046). RTO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. CNGO (330M). RTO has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CNGO (266M). CNGO has less debt than RTO: CNGO (1.66B) vs RTO (4.73B). RTO has higher revenues than CNGO: RTO (5.38B) vs CNGO (1.34B).
CNGORTOCNGO / RTO
Capitalization828M15B6%
EBITDA330M1.16B29%
Gain YTD20.513-6.046-339%
P/E RatioN/A31.29-
Revenue1.34B5.38B25%
Total Cash266M1.55B17%
Total Debt1.66B4.73B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNGO vs RTO: Fundamental Ratings
CNGO
RTO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6964
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTO's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNGO (78). This means that RTO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

CNGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTO (100). This means that CNGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTO’s over the last 12 months.

RTO's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (100). This means that RTO’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

CNGO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RTO (58). This means that CNGO’s stock grew similarly to RTO’s over the last 12 months.

RTO's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (69). This means that RTO’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIHX22.27-0.21
-0.93%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A
BCBDX12.62-0.14
-1.10%
BlackRock Global Dividend Inv C
MMBLX12.28-0.14
-1.13%
MassMutual Balanced Adm
CNRWX24.56-0.29
-1.17%
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
SMISX29.70-0.41
-1.36%
Invesco Summit R6

CNGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNGO and WTLLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNGO and WTLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNGO
1D Price
Change %
CNGO100%
N/A
WTLLF - CNGO
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
RTO - CNGO
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
STGXF - CNGO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSEFY - CNGO
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBMJ - CNGO
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.01%
More

RTO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTO has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTO jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTO
1D Price
Change %
RTO100%
-2.05%
RELX - RTO
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
MSA - RTO
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
IKTSY - RTO
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
ARMK - RTO
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
REZI - RTO
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
More