Advertisement
CNFR vs LMND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNFR is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNFR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNFR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNFR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMND’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNFR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LMND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNFR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -27.00% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -15.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNFR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
LMND is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.02% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| CNFR | LMND | CNFR / LMND | |
| Capitalization | 14.5M | 3.8B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.701 | 40.213 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 52M | 601M | 9% |
| Total Cash | 110M | 670M | 16% |
| Total Debt | 12.1M | 144M | 8% |
CNFR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CNFR | LMND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
CNFR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNFR and MSADF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNFR and MSADF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNFR | 100% | -4.81% | ||
| MSADF - CNFR | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALL - CNFR | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| DGICB - CNFR | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LMND - CNFR | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| NODK - CNFR | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| ROOT - LMND | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| HIPO - LMND | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TRUP - LMND | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| UFCS - LMND | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BNT - LMND | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||