CNF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.02 (+3.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
139.22M
64 days until earnings call
PT
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNF vs PT

Header iconCNF vs PT Comparison
Open Charts CNF vs PTBanner chart's image
CNFinance Holdings
Price$0.63
Change+$0.02 (+3.28%)
Volume$98.2K
Capitalization139.22M
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.06K
Capitalization17.38M
CNF vs PT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNF vs. PT commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNF is a Buy and PT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CNF: $0.63 vs. PT: $0.90)
Brand notoriety: CNF and PT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNF: 44% vs. PT: 29%
Market capitalization -- CNF: $139.22M vs. PT: $17.38M
CNF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $139.22M. PT’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNF is a better buy in the long-term than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNF is a better buy in the short-term than PT.

Price Growth

CNF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNF is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNF($139M) has a higher market cap than PT($17.4M). PT YTD gains are higher at: -0.033 vs. CNF (-34.000). PT has less debt than CNF: PT (400M) vs CNF (6.84B). CNF has higher revenues than PT: CNF (1.19B) vs PT (173M).
CNFPTCNF / PT
Capitalization139M17.4M799%
EBITDAN/A-57.14M-
Gain YTD-34.000-0.033102,017%
P/E Ratio6.02N/A-
Revenue1.19B173M690%
Total CashN/A231M-
Total Debt6.84B400M1,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNF vs PT: Fundamental Ratings
CNF
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
11100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PT's Valuation (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNF (69) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to CNF’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNF (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to CNF’s over the last 12 months.

CNF's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

CNF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (80) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNF’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.

CNF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNFPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWG14.050.17
+1.22%
NatWest Group plc
CTLP11.010.02
+0.14%
Cantaloupe
MCVT1.86N/A
N/A
Mill City Ventures III Ltd
IRT17.57-0.14
-0.79%
Independence Realty Trust
VTYX2.35-0.11
-4.29%
Ventyx Biosciences

CNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNF and YRD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNF and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNF
1D Price
Change %
CNF100%
+2.79%
YRD - CNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
LU - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
PT - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LX - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
QFIN - CNF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More

PT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PT and LU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PT and LU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PT
1D Price
Change %
PT100%
N/A
LU - PT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MCVT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UHAL - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
AER - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
RKT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More