CNF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.02 (-4.26%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
139.22M
LU
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.02 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNF vs LU

Header iconCNF vs LU Comparison
Open Charts CNF vs LUBanner chart's image
CNFinance Holdings
Price$0.45
Change-$0.02 (-4.26%)
Volume$557.38K
Capitalization139.22M
Lufax Holding
Price$2.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.68%)
Volume$2.23M
Capitalization5.09B
CNF vs LU Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNF vs. LU commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNF is a Hold and LU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CNF: $0.40 vs. LU: $3.04)
Brand notoriety: CNF and LU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNF: 178% vs. LU: 72%
Market capitalization -- CNF: $139.22M vs. LU: $5.09B
CNF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $139.22M. LU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than CNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the short-term than CNF.

Price Growth

CNF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -30.32% price change this week, while LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +3.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than CNF($139M). LU has higher P/E ratio than CNF: LU (19.53) vs CNF (6.02). LU YTD gains are higher at: 27.197 vs. CNF (-57.989). CNF has less debt than LU: CNF (6.84B) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than CNF: LU (32B) vs CNF (1.19B).
CNFLUCNF / LU
Capitalization139M5.09B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-57.98927.197-213%
P/E Ratio6.0219.5331%
Revenue1.19B32B4%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt6.84B43.1B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNF: Fundamental Ratings
CNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNFLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNF and YRD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNF and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNF
1D Price
Change %
CNF100%
-4.98%
YRD - CNF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
LU - CNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
LX - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
PT - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
QFIN - CNF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-3.49%
QFIN - LU
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
FINV - LU
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
YRD - LU
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
LX - LU
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
DWAY - LU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More