CNDT
Price
$2.64
Change
-$0.05 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
427.23M
31 days until earnings call
EPAM
Price
$174.93
Change
+$0.93 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.91B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNDT vs EPAM

Header iconCNDT vs EPAM Comparison
Open Charts CNDT vs EPAMBanner chart's image
Conduent
Price$2.64
Change-$0.05 (-1.86%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization427.23M
Epam Systems
Price$174.93
Change+$0.93 (+0.53%)
Volume$972.26K
Capitalization9.91B
CNDT vs EPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNDT vs. EPAM commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNDT is a Buy and EPAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CNDT: $2.64 vs. EPAM: $174.93)
Brand notoriety: CNDT and EPAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNDT: 128% vs. EPAM: 116%
Market capitalization -- CNDT: $427.23M vs. EPAM: $9.91B
CNDT [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $427.23M. EPAM’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $9.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $269.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNDT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNDT is a better buy in the long-term than EPAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EPAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNDT is a better buy in the short-term than EPAM.

Price Growth

CNDT (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +7.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNDT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

EPAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+3.24% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPAM($9.91B) has a higher market cap than CNDT($427M). EPAM has higher P/E ratio than CNDT: EPAM (24.47) vs CNDT (1.83). EPAM YTD gains are higher at: -25.186 vs. CNDT (-34.653). EPAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 670M vs. CNDT (571M). EPAM has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. CNDT (277M). EPAM has less debt than CNDT: EPAM (158M) vs CNDT (836M). EPAM has higher revenues than CNDT: EPAM (4.86B) vs CNDT (3.19B).
CNDTEPAMCNDT / EPAM
Capitalization427M9.91B4%
EBITDA571M670M85%
Gain YTD-34.653-25.186138%
P/E Ratio1.8324.477%
Revenue3.19B4.86B66%
Total Cash277M1.17B24%
Total Debt836M158M529%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNDT vs EPAM: Fundamental Ratings
CNDT
EPAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
2863
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNDT's Valuation (36) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

CNDT's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

CNDT's SMR Rating (28) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

CNDT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

EPAM's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNDT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNDT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNDTEPAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMO9.850.05
+0.51%
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
FSTA50.950.20
+0.39%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
GSIB43.450.07
+0.16%
Themes Global Systemically Imp Bks ETF
RSJN32.630.05
+0.16%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eq Wght Buffr ETF - Jun
EAPR27.92-0.06
-0.22%
Innovator Em Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF - Apr

CNDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNDT has been loosely correlated with VYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNDT jumps, then VYX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNDT
1D Price
Change %
CNDT100%
-1.86%
VYX - CNDT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CTLP - CNDT
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
IBEX - CNDT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
EPAM - CNDT
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
VRRM - CNDT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More

EPAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAM
1D Price
Change %
EPAM100%
+0.53%
CTSH - EPAM
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
KD - EPAM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
ACN - EPAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
GLOB - EPAM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
IT - EPAM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More