CNDCF
Price
$8.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
218.44M
MGLD
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNDCF vs MGLD

Header iconCNDCF vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts CNDCF vs MGLDBanner chart's image
Canadian Banc
Price$8.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$730
Capitalization218.44M
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$0.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization49.69M
CNDCF vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNDCF vs. MGLD commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNDCF is a Hold and MGLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CNDCF: $8.45 vs. MGLD: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: CNDCF and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNDCF: 108% vs. MGLD: 48%
Market capitalization -- CNDCF: $218.44M vs. MGLD: $49.69M
CNDCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $218.44M. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $49.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNDCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNDCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNDCF is a better buy in the long-term than MGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNDCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNDCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNDCF is a better buy in the short-term than MGLD.

Price Growth

CNDCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was -14.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNDCF($218M) has a higher market cap than MGLD($49.7M). MGLD has higher P/E ratio than CNDCF: MGLD (88.83) vs CNDCF (14.10). CNDCF YTD gains are higher at: 9.032 vs. MGLD (-55.682). MGLD has higher revenues than CNDCF: MGLD (33.9M) vs CNDCF (4.32M).
CNDCFMGLDCNDCF / MGLD
Capitalization218M49.7M439%
EBITDAN/A-983.96K-
Gain YTD9.032-55.682-16%
P/E Ratio14.1088.8316%
Revenue4.32M33.9M13%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.73M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNDCF vs MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
CNDCF
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52100
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5289
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
972
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNDCF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGLD (82). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (100). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MGLD (95). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

CNDCF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (89). This means that CNDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNDCF (97). This means that MGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than CNDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNDCFMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SITIY34.592.30
+7.12%
SITC International Holdings Company, Ltd.
BWB17.000.25
+1.49%
Bridgewater Bancshares
AN212.500.51
+0.24%
AutoNation
BHVN14.63-0.13
-0.88%
Biohaven Ltd
MOGO2.20-0.37
-14.40%
Mogo

CNDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNDCF and VINP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNDCF and VINP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNDCF
1D Price
Change %
CNDCF100%
N/A
VINP - CNDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
MGLD - CNDCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - CNDCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
ESIFF - CNDCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - CNDCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and HNNA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and HNNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
N/A
HNNA - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
RESCU - MGLD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICMB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
ALTI - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
DEFG - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More