CNBZ
Price
$18.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
16M
KPCUF
Price
$4.76
Change
+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNBZ vs KPCUF

Header iconCNBZ vs KPCUF Comparison
Open Charts CNBZ vs KPCUFBanner chart's image
CNB Corp. (MI)
Price$18.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization16M
KASIKORNBANK Public
Price$4.76
Change+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.71B
CNBZ vs KPCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNBZ vs. KPCUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNBZ is a Hold and KPCUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CNBZ: $18.00 vs. KPCUF: $4.76)
Brand notoriety: CNBZ and KPCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNBZ: 73% vs. KPCUF: 19%
Market capitalization -- CNBZ: $16M vs. KPCUF: $8.71B
CNBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16M. KPCUF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNBZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPCUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KPCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KPCUF is a better buy in the long-term than CNBZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNBZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CNBZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CNBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KPCUF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KPCUF($8.71B) has a higher market cap than CNBZ($16M). KPCUF YTD gains are higher at: 34.077 vs. CNBZ (2.857). KPCUF has higher revenues than CNBZ: KPCUF (180B) vs CNBZ (10.1M).
CNBZKPCUFCNBZ / KPCUF
Capitalization16M8.71B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.85734.0778%
P/E RatioN/A8.42-
Revenue10.1M180B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A254B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNBZ vs KPCUF: Fundamental Ratings
CNBZ
KPCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6740
SMR RATING
1..100
271
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPCUF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNBZ (91). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than CNBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CNBZ (67). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to CNBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CNBZ (27). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to CNBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CNBZ (59). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to CNBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CNBZ (53). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to CNBZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNBZKPCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSYD47.940.03
+0.06%
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
XTR28.47N/A
N/A
Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF
UAPR31.36N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Apr
VTEB48.95-0.02
-0.04%
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
MEGI14.29-0.02
-0.14%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund

CNBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNBZ and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNBZ and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNBZ
1D Price
Change %
CNBZ100%
N/A
KPCUF - CNBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTYB - CNBZ
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNBBY - CNBZ
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CNND - CNBZ
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPKF - CNBZ
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KPCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPCUF and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPCUF and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPCUF
1D Price
Change %
KPCUF100%
N/A
EQGPF - KPCUF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBZ - KPCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOUB - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
FRSB - KPCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.44%
More