CNBP
Price
$88.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PONT
Price
$530.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNBP vs PONT

Header iconCNBP vs PONT Comparison
Open Charts CNBP vs PONTBanner chart's image
Cornerstone Ban
Price$88.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.28%)
Volume$350
CapitalizationN/A
Pontiac Ban
Price$530.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
CNBP vs PONT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNBP vs. PONT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNBP is a Hold and PONT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CNBP: $88.00 vs. PONT: $524.71)
Brand notoriety: CNBP and PONT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNBP: 119% vs. PONT: 100%
Market capitalization -- CNBP: $0 vs. PONT: $0
CNBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. PONT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePONT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PONT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNBP is a better buy in the long-term than PONT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNBP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNBP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PONT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNBP is a better buy in the short-term than PONT.

Price Growth

CNBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while PONT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNBP YTD gains are higher at: 9.835 vs. PONT (0.000).
CNBPPONTCNBP / PONT
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.8350.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PONT: Fundamental Ratings
PONT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNBPPONT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
5%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTZ2.570.21
+8.90%
Intrusion
YI7.430.09
+1.23%
111 Inc
WAFD31.210.32
+1.04%
WaFd
EBF18.660.09
+0.48%
Ennis
AMH35.600.16
+0.45%
American Homes 4 Rent

CNBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNBP and PONT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNBP and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNBP
1D Price
Change %
CNBP100%
N/A
PONT - CNBP
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXCH - CNBP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBCRY - CNBP
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
DIMC - CNBP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
FSFG - CNBP
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More

PONT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONT has been loosely correlated with BPHLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONT jumps, then BPHLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONT
1D Price
Change %
PONT100%
N/A
BPHLF - PONT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - PONT
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - PONT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBP - PONT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More