It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while MCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.72%.
CNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
MCY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
CNA | MCY | CNA / MCY | |
Capitalization | 12.3B | 2.86B | 431% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.490 | -9.358 | -37% |
P/E Ratio | 10.10 | 30.21 | 33% |
Revenue | 13.1B | 4.63B | 283% |
Total Cash | 42.9B | 729M | 5,885% |
Total Debt | 3.03B | 588M | 515% |
CNA | MCY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNA's Valuation (24) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as MCY (43) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to MCY’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCY (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCY’s over the last 12 months.
MCY's SMR Rating (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNA (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNA’s over the last 12 months.
MCY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (51) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCY (77) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCY’s over the last 12 months.
CNA | MCY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago52% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago46% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 3 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago56% | 11 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNA has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNA jumps, then L could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCY has been loosely correlated with KMPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCY jumps, then KMPR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCY | 100% | -1.02% | ||
KMPR - MCY | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
CINF - MCY | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
THG - MCY | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
CNA - MCY | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
ALL - MCY | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
More |