CMWCF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
FRLOF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.02 (-2.99%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMWCF vs FRLOF

Header iconCMWCF vs FRLOF Comparison
Open Charts CMWCF vs FRLOFBanner chart's image
Cromwell
Price$0.28
Change-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Volume$380
Capitalization4.01B
FRASERS LOGISTICS & Commercial Trust
Price$0.65
Change-$0.02 (-2.99%)
Volume$7.81K
Capitalization3.47B
CMWCF vs FRLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMWCF vs. FRLOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMWCF is a Hold and FRLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMWCF: $0.28 vs. FRLOF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: CMWCF and FRLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMWCF: 100% vs. FRLOF: 305%
Market capitalization -- CMWCF: $4.01B vs. FRLOF: $3.47B
CMWCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.01B. FRLOF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMWCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMWCF and FRLOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRLOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRLOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CMWCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRLOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.52% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMWCF($4.01B) has a higher market cap than FRLOF($3.47B). FRLOF has higher P/E ratio than CMWCF: FRLOF (8.19) vs CMWCF (7.63). CMWCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FRLOF (-3.973). FRLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 744M vs. CMWCF (378M). CMWCF has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. FRLOF (151M). FRLOF (2.1B) and CMWCF (2.19B) have identical debt. FRLOF has higher revenues than CMWCF: FRLOF (422M) vs CMWCF (361M).
CMWCFFRLOFCMWCF / FRLOF
Capitalization4.01B3.47B116%
EBITDA378M744M51%
Gain YTD0.000-3.973-
P/E Ratio7.638.1993%
Revenue361M422M86%
Total Cash194M151M128%
Total Debt2.19B2.1B104%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEJX9.960.18
+1.84%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv
PLFIX30.410.25
+0.83%
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Inst
MXYKX5.420.02
+0.37%
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Instl
FMFAX91.920.02
+0.02%
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
NWHJX11.02-0.01
-0.09%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A

CMWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMWCF and PLD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMWCF and PLD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMWCF
1D Price
Change %
CMWCF100%
N/A
PLD - CMWCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
FR - CMWCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
TRNO - CMWCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
PECO - CMWCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
NLCP - CMWCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More

FRLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRLOF and KBSR have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRLOF and KBSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRLOF
1D Price
Change %
FRLOF100%
N/A
KBSR - FRLOF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCOK - FRLOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEVN - FRLOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
CMWCF - FRLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PECO - FRLOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More