CMVLF
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
224.18M
TARS
Price
$41.50
Change
-$0.94 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMVLF vs TARS

Header iconCMVLF vs TARS Comparison
Open Charts CMVLF vs TARSBanner chart's image
Cellectis Romainville
Price$1.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization224.18M
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals
Price$41.50
Change-$0.94 (-2.21%)
Volume$442.11K
Capitalization1.74B
CMVLF vs TARS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TARS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMVLF vs. TARS commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVLF is a Hold and TARS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CMVLF: $1.25 vs. TARS: $41.50)
Brand notoriety: CMVLF and TARS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMVLF: 94% vs. TARS: 79%
Market capitalization -- CMVLF: $224.18M vs. TARS: $1.74B
CMVLF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $224.18M. TARS’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $313.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMVLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTARS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TARS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TARS is a better buy in the long-term than CMVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TARS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TARS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CMVLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TARS (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +7.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

TARS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+7.60% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TARS($1.74B) has a higher market cap than CMVLF($224M). CMVLF YTD gains are higher at: -16.667 vs. TARS (-25.050). CMVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -32.49M vs. TARS (-94.96M). TARS has more cash in the bank: 408M vs. CMVLF (242M). TARS has less debt than CMVLF: TARS (72.4M) vs CMVLF (91.8M). TARS has higher revenues than CMVLF: TARS (234M) vs CMVLF (47.6M).
CMVLFTARSCMVLF / TARS
Capitalization224M1.74B13%
EBITDA-32.49M-94.96M34%
Gain YTD-16.667-25.05067%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue47.6M234M20%
Total Cash242M408M59%
Total Debt91.8M72.4M127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMVLF: Fundamental Ratings
CMVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMVLFTARS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TARS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHSRX22.500.18
+0.81%
Hartford Small Company R3
HSMAX12.330.04
+0.33%
Hartford Small Cap Value A
LMOPX37.730.11
+0.29%
Patient Opportunity C
PAHWX8.27N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps A
PIIDX15.29-0.04
-0.26%
Principal International Equity R-6

CMVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMVLF has been loosely correlated with TENX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMVLF jumps, then TENX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMVLF
1D Price
Change %
CMVLF100%
N/A
TENX - CMVLF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
SBHMY - CMVLF
51%
Loosely correlated
+7.36%
AURA - CMVLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
ALDX - CMVLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
TARS - CMVLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More

TARS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TARS has been loosely correlated with ADMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TARS jumps, then ADMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TARS
1D Price
Change %
TARS100%
-2.21%
ADMA - TARS
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.04%
OCUL - TARS
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
RYTM - TARS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
ETNB - TARS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
RVMD - TARS
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More